Regarding the Extra content, if I use .bibbase_paper_content { display: none; }, I also hide the link icon and the abstract

Then I misunderstood by Extra content. Can you explain what it is you want to hide?

It looks like the bibtex format Zotero exposes via it's API doesn't include the links to the external PDFs you are using in those 2023 publications. Here is what we are receiving:

@article{uribe-arias_radial_2023,
  title = {Radial astrocyte synchronization modulates the visual system during behavioral-state transitions},
  copyright = {CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication},
  issn = {1097-4199},
  url = {https://www.cell.com/neuron/abstract/S0896-6273(23)00709-2},
  doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.022},
  abstract = {...},
  language = {eng},
  journal = {Neuron},
  author = {Uribe-Arias, Alejandro and Rozenblat, Rotem and Vinepinsky, Ehud and Marachlian, Emiliano and Kulkarni, Anirudh and Zada, David and Privat, Martin and Topsakalian, Diego and Charpy, Sarah and Candat, Virginie and Nourin, Sarah and Appelbaum, Lior and Sumbre, Germán},
  month = oct,
  year = {2023},
  pages = {S0896--6273(23)00709--2}
}

If you want more control and that's an option for you, you can always use a bibtex file directly as the data-source for BibBase, i.e., do without Zotero. That would allow you to link to your PDFs no matter where they are.

Thanks for the link. And not sure I understand your comment about "No Data". I see this when I open your page right now and it seems to be using Zotero:

Getting back to the original question: which of these publications have an external PDF link in Zotero?

Hi German, Can you point me to your page where you have your Zotero publications embedded with BibBase? It would help me investigate what's possible re. external links to PDFs. As for the extra content, you can definitely hide that with CSS. Try adding .bibbase_paper_content { display: none; } to your CSS.

Looking at the style as described in https://www.bath.ac.uk/publications/library-guides-to-citing-referencing/attachments/ieee-style-guide.pdf:

S. Adachi, T. Horio, T. Suzuki. "Intense vacuum-ultraviolet single-order harmonic pulse by a deep-ultraviolet driving laser," in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Optics, San Jose, CA, 2012, pp.2118-2120.

I think if you set "authorFirst" in BibBase you can already get very close to IEEE style. You might even be able to make all the remaining changes with CSS (make title not bold but italic, add quotation marks before and after the title).

Hi Cedric,

I've tried three different browsers (Chrome, Firefox, and Edge) and all three show them fine for me:

I'll need to find a Mac to test on Safari. But in the meantime, can you verify that you don't have any ad-blocker or other extension installed in your browser that is preventing some of our stylesheets from loading? Also, could you open the dev tools console in Safari, reload the page, and copy & paste all the messages you might be getting on the console?

Thanks,

Christian

Kyle,

Look at the group link provided on https://bibbase.org/service/zotero (when you are logged in). The groupId is the first number in that URL, between "users%2F" and "%2Fcollections", e.g., in 
https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fusers%2F10176%2Fcollections
the groupid is 10176.

Did you already read through https://bibbase.userecho.com/communities/1/topics/23-only-small-part-of-zotero-group-library-is-displayed ?

Yes, the keywords field is interpreted as a comma-separated list. I don't think there currently is a way around that, other than using a different character, e.g., a semicolon. Alternatively, but somewhat hacky, you could use a different comma from https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/category/Po, e.g., a full-width comma or an arabic comma.

Hi Iago,

I forced a refetch from Zotero by adding `nocache=1` to the URL once (link). The C-reactive paper is gone now:
https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/iagogv/4865242

The Zotero API is too slow for us to fetch from it every time the page refreshes, so we need to cache the results. The cache get updated regularly (I think currently once a day or so), so you could probably also have just waited. But if you want to force a refresh, you can always open the above link with nocache once manually.