I'd go for prioritizing 4: I 've noted that a few bibbase users rely on Mendeley (i.e. it's not just me) and that there are some straightforward improvements to do (see my other post).
It would also be a way to attract users outside of the computer science community.
Point three would be nice too. I was thinking that providing visitors with the opportunity to leave a comment for each paper is a feature that would actually promote scientific discussions. But this feature might be on the far side, since it would mean implementing a blog-like feature ...(?)
I'm not too found of "more statistics": we have statistics all over: google scholar, impact factors of journals, number of downloads on most platforms, ... They have their utility, but for a personal webpage, I don't think they would bring some added value.
I'd go for prioritizing 4: I 've noted that a few bibbase users rely on Mendeley (i.e. it's not just me) and that there are some straightforward improvements to do (see my other post).
It would also be a way to attract users outside of the computer science community.
Point three would be nice too. I was thinking that providing visitors with the opportunity to leave a comment for each paper is a feature that would actually promote scientific discussions. But this feature might be on the far side, since it would mean implementing a blog-like feature ...(?)I'm not too found of "more statistics": we have statistics all over: google scholar, impact factors of journals, number of downloads on most platforms, ... They have their utility, but for a personal webpage, I don't think they would bring some added value.
In any case, thanks for your great work.