Such mapping is not supported, because we cannot assume that others who use numbers instead of text would want it to be translated. So why not just change the bibtex to use the abbreviated month names?

I think that that might just not work for groups yet, see https://bibbase.userecho.com/communities/1/topics/23-only-small-part-of-zotero-group-library-is-displayed#comment-92. The best workaround for now is to use a shared account and use the "My Library" collection from that account instead of a group. Would that work in your case?

I see lots of conference papers:

What is missing?

I can't debug this if I cannot see what you see. The connector gives you a URL and I assume that URL is where you saw something missing. Can you share that URL?

Can you provide a link to your page where you use BibBase?

Sorry, no that is not currently possible. We *strongly* recommend against using iframes. The external script method should work everywhere because that is how almost all web pages work these days: they pull in scripts from other places, not just the local server where the HTML is hosted.

The verified publications could be interesting! Is there an example profile of a researcher that shows those? I'd like to get a sense of how broadly it is used and how many records they have.

However I'm still not quite clear what you are proposing in terms of integration. Since BibBase users use BibBase to show their own publication list on their own homepage, it is relatively unlikely that anyone would post publications that are not indeed correct (unverified and false). So I don't see too much being gained by verifying them again with ORCiD. But again, maybe you had a different integration in mind?

No, we have not. What would be the benefit? From what I can tell from poking around the web site, they currently mostly provide just a page that identifies a researcher. But it doesn't even link to anything else, so what would be gained by connecting authors on bibbase to their orcid pages? -- If that wasn't the integration you had in mind, then please let us know what you were thinking. Thanks.

The way BibBase associates author names with pages is by seeing whether all publications on a page have a common author. If so, BibBase concludes that this must be the best page to link with their name. Normally name-collisions do not happen, because BibBase just doesn't have that many users to have duplicate last name + first initial. In this case, it seems that the page that was linked to had only one publication at one point in the past (on 2016-07-06 to be precise) with that name on it, and so your short-name was associated with that.

I've gone ahead and removed the wrong association.