Your comments

The updated graph and mouse-tracked table looks and works fantastic! Thanks very much for this big improvement.

If I were to make one tiny additional suggestion: now that the numbers are getting bigger, it would be nice if the infection and death counts had commas every 3 digits.

Thanks! You didn't mention this, but I determined by trial & error that "&deaths=1" also works as a URL parameter.

Thanks! Nice to see this data. I assume it is a work in progress, since some US states (e.g. Wisconsin) are incomplete and/or do not have counties present yet.

One other suggestion: I notice that the US states have a country of "USA" while the country data entry is listed as "US".  The country should probably be renamed to "USA" to make things consistent and easier to filter. (Typing just "US" in the filter box will include Austria, Australia, etc.)

1) I have noticed that if you open the site in its own window and you resize it narrower, it will push the Country/Region table to the bottom and expand the graph to the full width of the window. Seems to be part of a responsive design to display better on tablets and phones. But perhaps an option could be available to do this on wide screens also.

Hello,

As others have said, thank you for a very useful tool.  I have a small suggestion that I hope would not be too difficult to implement, that I think would improve the graph results.

Currently, when the "Log scale" is turned off, and you hover the mouse over the graph, a colored table is presented that shows the values for the date corresponding to the mouse position, with the actual numeric values displayed. I like this.  However, when you click the "Log scale" option on and do the same thing, the values displayed in the table are just the powers of 10. For example, 1e+3, 2e+0.  I realize that these values correspond to the axis labels for the graph, but I think it would be more useful if the same values were displayed in the table as the ones when "Log scale" is not active. That is, the actual numeric values.

Thanks again for providing this, and please let me know if any of my comments need clarification.

Best,

Mike