Twoje komentarze
We have decided to remove the "buy" links entirely from users' publication pages. While we are still interested in finding a viable business model for BibBase, this approach clearly did not resonate well with our users.
We have decided to remove the "buy" links entirely from users' publication pages. While we are still interested in finding a viable business model for BibBase, this approach clearly did not resonate well with our users.
We are happy to announce that the ability to filter on multiple criteria is now supported, see https://bibbase.org/blog/new-feature-multiple-filters.
Murilo,
Your example has motivated us to extend our filter feature to allow multiple-features now, see https://bibbase.org/blog/new-feature-multiple-filters. So you should now be able to do all of the above.
Re. 1.: yes, in fact you can. The value to filter on is actually a regular expression, so "filter=year:(201.|202.)" would only show years 2010-2029.
Re. 2: yes, you can use "filter=type:(article|inproceedings)".
However, right now BibBase does not allow multiple simultaneous filters, so you will only be able to do one of these things right now, not both together.
We've read the criteria to become white listed on Wordpress core (which is what I assume you are using to host) and I doubt that they will accept us, given how short the list of whitelisted providers is. Or are you using a self-hosted Wordpress instance?
No problem, I've removed the claim from Hutter, M in the database. The link is gone now and should not re-appear.
BTW, I noticed what seems to be a typo in the entry for:
Huttery instead of Hutter.
Yes, this is a short-coming of Mendeley -- which we really don't recommend. They don't have a type for Master's Thesis and PhD Thesis (like bibtex has). They only have the type "thesis". So there is no safe way to map it either Master's or PhD thesis. I recommend changing the type of this library item in your Mendeley library to "generic" and adding "Master's Thesis" to one of the other fields until the result looks as you want it. Better yet, if that's an option for you, I'd recommend switching to a self-hosted bibtex file (or hosted on github pages).
There is nothing we can do from the BibBase side on this. This is a restriction from Wordpress. Same web hosts, incl. also Google Sites, just don't allow embedding script tags. The only embedding option with those is usually iframes (if those are allowed), but that's not a good option.
We always recommend hosting your own page yourself (if necessary via Github pages, you can just fork our example), using a bibtex file as source (although Zotero is a decent option, too), and embed using the script tag. This combination give you the most control.
Customer support service by UserEcho
No, unfortunately there isn't. This is one of the many reasons why iframe-based embedding is not recommended. Unfortunately wordpress does not allow any other way of embedding as far as we know, which is why we usually recommend other hosting platforms, like github pages (which is what the Example linked from the bibbase homepage is based on).